ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
Thermodynamically consistent determination of free energies and rates in kinetic cycle models.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Kinetic and thermodynamic models of biological systems are commonly used to connect microscopic features to system function in a bottom-up multiscale approach. The parameters of such models-free energy differences for equilibrium properties and in general rates for equilibrium and out-of-equilibrium observables-have to be measured by different experiments or calculated from multiple computer simulations. All such parameters necessarily come with uncertainties so that when they are naively combined in a full model of the process of interest, they will generally violate fundamental statistical mechanical equalities, namely detailed balance and an equality of forward/backward rate products in cycles due to T. Hill. If left uncorrected, such models can produce arbitrary outputs that are physically inconsistent. Here we develop a maximum likelihood approach (named WHY IT MATTERS: The increase in computational efficiency and rapid advances in methodology for quantitative free energy and rate calculations has allowed for the construction of increasingly complex thermodynamic or kinetic "bottom-up" models of chemical and biological processes. These multi-scale models serve as a framework for analyzing aspects of cellular function in terms of microscopic, molecular properties and provide an opportunity to connect molecular mechanisms to cellular function. The underlying model parameters-free energy differences or rates-are constrained by thermodynamic identities over cycles of states but these identities are not necessarily obeyed during model construction, thus potentially leading to inconsistent models. We address these inconsistencies through the use of a maximum likelihood approach for free energies and rates to adjust the model parameters in such a way that they are maximally consistent with the input parameters and exactly fulfill the thermodynamic cycle constraints. This approach enables formulation of thermodynamically consistent multi-scale models from simulated or experimental measurements.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.