ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
BNP-Track: A framework for multi-particle superresolved tracking.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When tracking fluorescently labeled molecules (termed "emitters") under widefield microscopes, point spread function overlap of neighboring molecules is inevitable in both dilute and especially crowded environments. In such cases, superresolution methods leveraging rare photophysical events to distinguish static targets nearby in space introduce temporal delays that compromise tracking. As we have shown in a companion manuscript, for dynamic targets, information on neighboring fluorescent molecules is encoded as spatial intensity correlations across pixels and temporal correlations in intensity patterns across time frames. We then demonstrated how we used all spatiotemporal correlations encoded in the data to achieve superresolved tracking. That is, we showed the results of full posterior inference over both the number of emitters and their associated tracks simultaneously and self-consistently through Bayesian nonparametrics. In this companion manuscript we focus on testing the robustness of our tracking tool, BNP-Track, across sets of parameter regimes and compare BNP-Track to competing tracking methods in the spirit of a prior Nature Methods tracking competition. We explore additional features of BNP-Track including how a stochastic treatment of background yields greater accuracy in emitter number determination and how BNP-Track corrects for point spread function blur (or "aliasing") introduced by intraframe motion in addition to propagating error originating from myriad sources (such as criss-crossing tracks, out-of-focus particles, pixelation, shot and camera artefact, stochastic background) in posterior inference over emitter numbers and their associated tracks. While head-to-head comparison with other tracking methods is not possible (as competitors cannot simultaneously learn molecule numbers and associated tracks), we can give competing methods some advantages in order to perform approximate head-to-head comparison. We show that even under such optimistic scenarios, BNP-Track is capable of tracking multiple diffraction-limited point emitters conventional tracking methods cannot resolve thereby extending the superresolution paradigm to dynamical targets.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.