Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37066125›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023

Single-cell and long-read sequencing to enhance modelling of splicing and cell-fate determination.

Siyuan Wu, Ulf Schmitz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Targeting RNA splicing modulation: new perspectives for anticancer strategy?Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Advances in single-cell long-read sequencing technologies.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Siyuan WuDepartment of Molecular & Cell Biology, James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Queensland, Australia.
Ulf SchmitzDepartment of Molecular & Cell Biology, James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell sequencing technologies have revolutionised the life sciences and biomedical research. Single-cell sequencing provides high-resolution data on cell heterogeneity, allowing high-fidelity cell type identification, and lineage tracking. Computational algorithms and mathematical models have been developed to make sense of the data, compensate for errors and simulate the biological processes, which has led to breakthroughs in our understanding of cell differentiation, cell-fate determination and tissue cell composition. The development of long-read (a.k.a. third-generation) sequencing technologies has produced powerful tools for investigating alternative splicing, isoform expression (at the RNA level), genome assembly and the detection of complex structural variants (at the DNA level). In this review, we provide an overview of the recent advancements in single-cell and long-read sequencing technologies, with a particular focus on the computational algorithms that help in correcting, analysing, and interpreting the resulting data. Additionally, we review some mathematical models that use single-cell and long-read sequencing data to study cell-fate determination and alternative splicing, respectively. Moreover, we highlight the emerging opportunities in modelling cell-fate determination that result from the combination of single-cell and long-read sequencing technologies.

Indexed as

Alternative splicingIsoform expressionMathematical modellingPesudotemopral trajectory inferenceRNA velocityTranscriptome diversity

Identifiers

PMID37066125
PMCPMC10091034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.