ArticleOnco2022
Gene Screening in High-Throughput Right-Censored Lung Cancer Data.
Article in Onco, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Advances in sequencing technologies have allowed collection of massive genome-wide information that substantially advances lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Identifying influential markers for clinical endpoints of interest has been an indispensable and critical component of the statistical analysis pipeline. However, classical variable selection methods are not feasible or reliable for high-throughput genetic data. Our objective is to propose a model-free gene screening procedure for high-throughput right-censored data, and to develop a predictive gene signature for lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) with the proposed procedure. Methods: A gene screening procedure was developed based on a recently proposed independence measure. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data on LUSC was then studied. The screening procedure was conducted to narrow down the set of influential genes to 378 candidates. A penalized Cox model was then fitted to the reduced set, which further identified a 6-gene signature for LUSC prognosis. The 6-gene signature was validated on datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus. Results: Both model-fitting and validation results reveal that our method selected influential genes that lead to biologically sensible findings as well as better predictive performance, compared to existing alternatives. According to our multivariable Cox regression analysis, the 6-gene signature was indeed a significant prognostic factor ( Conclusions: Gene screening as a fast dimension reduction technique plays an important role in analyzing high-throughput data. The main contribution of this paper is to introduce a fundamental yet pragmatic model-free gene screening approach that aids statistical analysis of right-censored cancer data, and provide a lateral comparison with other available methods in the context of LUSC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.