Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37066064›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2023

Using DNA barcoding and field surveys to guide wildlife management at Nanjing Lukou International Airport, China.

Wan Chen, Keer Miao, Yizheng Liu, Jie Zhang, Yang Zhao, Dongfang Hu, Pengcheng Wang, Peng Li, Qing Chang, Chaochao Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mitochondrial markers (Veterinary world · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Wan ChenCollege of Environment and Ecology Jiangsu Open University (The City Vocational College of Jiangsu) Nanjing Jiangsu China.
Keer MiaoJiangsu Key Laboratory for Biodiversity and Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences Nanjing Normal University Nanjing Jiangsu China.
Yizheng LiuJiangsu Key Laboratory for Biodiversity and Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences Nanjing Normal University Nanjing Jiangsu China.
Jie ZhangChina Academy of Civil Aviation Science and Technology Beijing China.
Yang ZhaoNanjing Lukou International Airport Nanjing Jiangsu China.
Dongfang HuNanjing Lukou International Airport Nanjing Jiangsu China.
Pengcheng WangJiangsu Key Laboratory for Biodiversity and Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences Nanjing Normal University Nanjing Jiangsu China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3539-8376
Peng LiJiangsu Key Laboratory for Biodiversity and Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences Nanjing Normal University Nanjing Jiangsu China.
Qing ChangJiangsu Key Laboratory for Biodiversity and Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences Nanjing Normal University Nanjing Jiangsu China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1057-4393
Chaochao HuJiangsu Key Laboratory for Biodiversity and Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences Nanjing Normal University Nanjing Jiangsu China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0203-782X
Nanjing Normal University · CNISCO International (United States) · USChinese Academy of Civil Aviation Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conflicts between wildlife and aircraft have increased due to the development of the aviation industry. While many studies have quantified the relative hazards of wildlife to aircraft, few studies have combined DNA barcoding techniques with field surveys of bird communities in different habitats to reveal the exact species involved in bird strikes and how the habitat heterogeneity around airports affects bird communities and even the occurrence of bird strikes. Taking Nanjing Lukou International Airport in China as an example, based on the DNA barcoding technology and detailed field research, we establish the most commonly struck species, which can help managers identify the level of hazard and lead to meaningful reductions in hazards and costs associated with bird strike. The investigation of bird communities showed that there were 149 bird species recorded within an 8 km radius. There were 89, 88, 61, and 88 species in the woodland, wetland, farmland, and urban area, respectively. In total, 303 samples identified 82 species representing 13 orders and 32 family of birds from bird strike cases, of which 24 species were not found in the field survey. Passeriformes were the most common order of birds identified, with 43 species represented in 167 identifications. Skylark, Thrush, Shrike, Lapwing, and Swallow were most likely to cause damage or substantial damage to aircraft when strikes occurred. In addition to birds, we identified 69 bats individuals (accounting for 22.77%) using DNA barcoding. The Bray-Curtis similarity analysis revealed that species involved in bird strike had the highest similarity with urban area. Our findings suggest that policymakers should pay more attention to managing the wetlands and urban areas surrounding the airport. These findings imply that DNA barcoding can add to the environmental monitoring in airports, which can facilitate hazard management and improve air safety.

Indexed as

airportbird diversitybird strikeDNA barcode

Identifiers

PMID37066064
PMCPMC10099200
OpenAlexW4366083154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.