ArticleTransfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie2023
Monitoring Blood Supply in Germany: A Regulatory Perspective.
Article in Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- A Novel Scoring System Predicting Red Blood Cell Transfusion Requirements in Patients Undergoing Invasive Spine Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Patient Blood Management: We Still Have Work to Do.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2023Article
- How to Ensure Blood Supply and Blood Safety in the Future.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: A sufficient supply of safe, high-quality blood components for transfusion is essential to the healthcare system in Germany. The requirements for the current reporting system are laid down in the German Transfusion Act. The present work elaborates on the advantages and limitations of the current reporting system and investigates the feasibility of a pilot project that collects specific data on blood supply based on weekly reports. Materials and Methods: Selected data on blood collection and supply from 2009 to 2021 derived from the §21 German Transfusion Act database were examined. In addition, a pilot study over a period of 12 months was conducted on a voluntary basis. The number of red blood cell (RBC) concentrates was documented and stock availability was calculated weekly. Results: From 2009 to 2021, the annual number of RBC concentrates decreased from 4.68 to 3.43 million, the per capita distribution decreased from 58 to 41 RBC concentrates per 1,000 inhabitants. These figures did not change significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. The data of the 1-year pilot project represented 77% of the released RBC concentrates in Germany. Percentage share of O RhD positive RBC concentrates fluctuated between 35% and 22% and for O RhD negative concentrates between 17% and 5%. The availability of O RhD positive RBC concentrate stocks varied between 2.1 and 7.6 days. Conclusion: The data presented shows a decrease in annual RBC concentrate sales over an 11-year period and no further change over the past 2 years. A weekly monitoring of blood components detects acute problems in RBC provision and supply. Close monitoring seems helpful but should be combined with a nationwide supply strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.