Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37066053›Full record

ReviewTransfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie2023

Challenges for Plasma-Derived Medicinal Products.

Paul F W Strengers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Toward a Sociology of Plasma Products.International journal of social determinants of health and health services · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Paul F W StrengersConsultant Blood and Plasma Strategies, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Plasma-derived medicinal products (PDMPs) are medicinal products derived from human plasma, and a number of PDMPs are listed on the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines. These and other PDMPs are crucial for the prophylaxis and treatment of patients with immune deficiencies, autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, bleeding disorders, and a variety of congenital deficiency disorders. The majority of plasma supplies for manufacturing of PDMPs is coming from the USA. Summary: The future of treatments with PDMPs for PDMP-dependent patients depends on the supply of plasma. An imbalance in the global collection of plasma has resulted in regional and global shortages of essential PDMPs. The challenges at different level are mainly related on a balanced and sufficient supply in order to help the patients in need and should be addressed in order to safeguard the treatment with these essential lifesaving and disease mitigating medicines. Key Messages: It is advocated to consider plasma as a strategic resource comparable to energy and other rare resources and to investigate whether for the treatment of patients with rare diseases, a free market of PDMPs has its limitations and special protection measures should be developed. At the same time, plasma collections should be increased outside the USA, including in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Health economicsImmunoglobulinPlasmaPlasma donationPlasma products

Identifiers

PMID37066053
PMCPMC10091012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.