ArticleFrontiers in surgery2023
Characteristics of the paravertebral muscle in adult degenerative scoliosis with PI-LL match or mismatch and risk factors for PI-LL mismatch.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-Term Management of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in Adulthood: Clinical Challenges and Progress During the Critical Period of Pregnancy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Radiological characteristics in coronal and sagittal planes and short-term postoperative outcomes in patients with lumbar disc herniation accompanied by sciatic scoliosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- MRI-based lumbar cross-sectional indentation value is associated with spinopelvic sagittal balance in patients with degenerative kyphosis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Pathogenic mechanisms of adult degenerative scoliosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- The Difference in Paraspinal Muscle Parameters and the Correlation with Health-Related Quality of Life among Healthy Individuals, Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Pelvic incidence (PI) minus the lumbar lordosis (LL) angle (PI-LL) correlates with function and disability. It is associated with paravertebral muscle (PVM) degeneration and is a valuable tool for surgical planning of adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS). This study aims to explore the characteristics of PVM in ADS with PI-LL match or mismatch and to identify the risk factors for PI-LL mismatch. Methods: A total of 67 patients with ADS were divided into PI-LL match and mismatch groups. The visual analog scale (VAS), symptom duration, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to assess patients' clinical symptoms and quality of life. The percentage of fat infiltration area (FIA%) of the multifidus muscle at the L1-S1 disc level was measured by using MRI with Image-J software. Sagittal vertical axis, LL, pelvic tilt (PT), PI, sacral slope, and the asymmetric and average degeneration degree of the multifidus were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was done to identify the risk factors for PI-LL mismatch. Results: In the PI-LL match and mismatch groups, the average FIA% of the multifidus on the convex side was less than that on the concave side ( Conclusion: The PVM on the concave side was larger than that on the convex side in ADS irrespective of whether PI-LL matched or not. PI-LL mismatch could aggravate this abnormal change, which is an important cause of pain and disability in ADS. Sagittal plane imbalance, decreased LL, higher PT, and larger average degeneration degree of the multifidus were independent risk factors for PI-LL mismatch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.