Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37065954›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2023

Evolution of anaesthesia technique for endolaryngeal surgery through and post-COVID-19 pandemic: An experience from a tertiary referral centre for airway surgery.

Swapna Naik, Sujit Saraf, Poonam Ghodki, Sunil Bapat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Swapna NaikDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Sujit SarafDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Poonam GhodkiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Sunil BapatDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Anaesthesia for endolaryngeal surgery is specialised to provide almost a tubeless surgical field. During the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic, when most of the surgeries were staggered, we being in a tertiary referral centre for airway surgery had to modify our existing techniques and observed an evolution in the anaesthesia management which we could continue even in the postpandemic period. Hence, we conducted this retrospective study to analyse the reliability of our locally developed apnoeic high-flow oxygenation technique (AHFO) for endolaryngeal procedures. Methods: We conducted this single-centric retrospective study from January 2020 to August 2021 to observe the choice of airway management techniques in endolaryngeal surgery and assess the feasibility and safety of AHFO. We also intend to propose an algorithm for airway management. We calculated the percentages of all necessary parameters to denote the trend in change of practices roughly classifying the study period as prepandemic, pandemic and postpandemic. Results: A total of 413 patients were analysed in our study. The changing trend over preference of AHFO from prepandemic (72%) and dominance of AHFO (92.5%) in the postpandemic period are the most significant observations of our study with 17% patients needing conversion to tube in-tube out technique due to desaturation which is comparable to 14% in prepandemic period. Conclusion: The tubeless field provided by AHFO replaced the conventional airway management techniques. Our study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of AHFO for endolaryngeal surgeries. We also propose an algorithm for anaesthetists involved in laryngology unit.

Indexed as

Apnoeic ventilationendolaryngeal surgeryhigh flowpandemic

Identifiers

PMID37065954
PMCPMC10104096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.