Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37065945›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2023

Major complications following central neuraxial block - A multi-centre observational study in Maharashtra (MGMM CNB Study).

Sadhana S Kulkarni, Deepak N Tayade, Pratibha P Kane, Kiran R Bhingarde, Paramanand N Jain, Savani S Futane, Vasanti P Kelkar, Mukund K Parchandekar, Jyoti V Kulkarni, Santosh K Prabhu and 10 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Sadhana S KulkarniDepartment of Emergency Medicine, MGM Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
Deepak N TayadeDepartment of Community Medicine and Anaesthesiology, MGM Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
Pratibha P KaneDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Jehangir Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Kiran R BhingardeSenior Consultant Anaesthesiologist, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India.
Paramanand N JainDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Savani S FutaneDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Maharashtra Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
Vasanti P KelkarDepartment of Community Medicine and Anaesthesiology, MGM Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
Mukund K ParchandekarDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Govt. Medical College, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
Jyoti V KulkarniDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Govt. Medical College, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
Santosh K PrabhuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Institute of Neuroscience, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India.
Anjali S KadduSenior Consultant Anaesthesiologist, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India.
Deepak S BhosleDepartment of Community Medicine and Anaesthesiology, MGM Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
Rajas K DeshpandeDepartment of Neurology, Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Archana S DeshpandeDepartment of Medicine, GMC Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Shubhangi V ShetkarSenior Radiologist, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
Prabha P NayakDepartment of Emergency Medicine, MGM Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
Yashoda S GunjaleDepartment of Community Medicine and Anaesthesiology, MGM Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
Pavan V DhulkhedDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Karad, Maharashtra, India.
Naseema V KanaseDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Karad, Maharashtra, India.
Prakash R DeshmukhConsultant Anaesthesiologist, Vaishnavi Hospital, Kalyan, Maharashtra, India.
Mahatma Gandhi Mission Medical College and Hospital · INAssociated Radiologists · USCollege of Medicine & JNM Hospital · INGovernment Medical College · INInstitute of Neurosciences Kolkata · INKrishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed University · INMaharashtra Institute of Medical Science and Research · INRuby Hall Clinic · INSanjay Ghodawat University · INTata Memorial Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Major complications of central neuraxial block (CNB) are rare and their incidence in India is not known. This information is essential for explaining risk and medico-legal concerns. The present multi-centre study in Maharashtra was conducted to provide insight into the characteristics of rare complications following this popular anaesthetic technique. Methods: Data were collected from 141 institutes to study the clinical profile of CNB. Incidence of complications like vertebral canal haematoma, abscess, meningitis, nerve injury, spinal cord ischaemia, fatal cardiovascular collapse, and drug errors was collected over one year. Complications were reviewed by audit committee to assess causation, severity, and outcome. 'Permanent' injury was defined as death or neurological symptoms persisting for more than six months. Results: Spinal anaesthesia (SA) was the most frequently used CNB in 88.76% patients. Bupivacaine and an adjuvant were used in 92.90% and 26.06% patients, respectively. Eight major complications (four neurological and four cardiac arrests) were reported in patients receiving SA. In seven of eight instances, SA was responsible or contributory for complication. The pessimistic incidence of complications (included cases where CNB was responsible; contribution was likely, unlikely and could not be commented) was 8.69/lakh and optimistic incidence (included cases where CNB was responsible or contribution was likely) was 7.61/lakh. 'Pessimistically' and 'optimistically' there were three deaths including one death due to quadriplegia following epidural haematoma after SA. Five out of eight patients recovered completely (62.5%). As only eight patients had complications of different types, it was difficult to establish statistical correlation of major complications with demographic or clinical parameters. Conclusion: This study was reassuring and suggested that the incidence of major complications following CNB was low in Maharashtra.

Indexed as

anaesthesiaAnaesthesiacardiac arrestencephalopathyepiduralmulticentre studyneuraxial anaesthesiaspinal

Identifiers

PMID37065945
PMCPMC10104102
OpenAlexW4319752424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.