ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
A Case of a Low Vault after Posterior Chamber Acrylic Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation.
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When implanting a posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (pIOL), it is crucial to maintain a safe distance. The patient was a 29-year-old man with high-degree bilateral myopia. In February 2021, posterior chamber acrylic pIOLs (Eyecryl Phakic TORIC; Biotech Vision Care, Gujarat, India) were implanted in both his eyes. After the surgery, the right eye vault was 6 μm, and the left eye vault was 350 μm. Moreover, the internal anterior chamber depth values were 2,270 and 2,220 μm for the right and left eyes, respectively. In our case, we found a fairly high crystalline lens rise (CLR) in both eyes, but it was greater in the right eye. The CLR value was +455 in the right eye and +350 in the left eye. In our patient, anterior segment anatomical parameters were higher in the right eye than in the left eye, and a greater pIOL length was calculated for the right eye, but the vault was very low. In our opinion, this was associated with the high CLR in the right eye. If an even larger pIOL had been implanted, there would have been a greater narrowing of the anterior chamber angle. This case would be contraindicated if those parameters were considered in selecting the indications and determination of the pIOL length.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.