Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37065590›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2023

Perioperative outcomes of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

Hai Zhang, Zhenyang Zhang, Litao Yang, Bomeng Wu, Ying Chen, Haiquan He, Cui Li, Wanli Lin, Jiangbo Lin

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hai Zhang *The Graduate School of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Zhenyang Zhang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Litao Yang *The Graduate School of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Bomeng WuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Gaozhou People's Hospital, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute Gaozhou Branch, Gaozhou, China.
Ying ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Gaozhou People's Hospital, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute Gaozhou Branch, Gaozhou, China.
Haiquan HeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Gaozhou People's Hospital, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute Gaozhou Branch, Gaozhou, China.
Cui LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Gaozhou People's Hospital, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute Gaozhou Branch, Gaozhou, China.
Wanli LinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Gaozhou People's Hospital, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute Gaozhou Branch, Gaozhou, China.
Jiangbo LinThe Graduate School of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Gaozhou People's Hospital · CNFujian Medical University · CNUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is recommended as the preferred treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Recent studies have shown that immune checkpoint inhibitors are beneficial in treating advanced esophageal cancer. Therefore, a growing number of clinical centers are conducting trials of neoadjuvant immunotherapy or neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (nICT) in patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer. Immunocheckpoint inhibitors are expected to play a role in neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer. However, there were few studies comparing nICT with nCRT. This study compared the efficacy and safety of nICT with that of nCRT administered prior to esophagectomy in patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: The study included patients with locally advanced resectable ESCC who were scheduled to receive neoadjuvant therapy at Gaozhou People's Hospital from January 1, 2019, to September 1, 2022. The enrolled patients were divided into 2 groups (nCRT or nICT) according to their neoadjuvant therapy regimen. The 2 groups were compared for their baseline data, the incidence of adverse events during neoadjuvant therapy, the clinical evaluation after neoadjuvant therapy, perioperative indicators, and the incidence of postoperative complications and postoperative pathological remission. Results: A total of 44 patients were enrolled; 23 in the nCRT group and 21 in the nICT group. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the baseline data. In the nCRT group, leukopenia occurred more often than in the nICT group, and hemoglobin-decreasing events were rarer (P=0.03<0.05). A significantly higher proportion of patients in the nICT group experienced erythema following neoadjuvant therapy compared to the nCRT group (23.81% Conclusions: nICT was a safe and feasible treatment for locally advanced ESCC and it may be a potential new treatment modality.

Indexed as

chemoradiotherapychemotherapyEsophageal cancerimmunotherapyneoadjuvant

Identifiers

PMID37065590
PMCPMC10089853
OpenAlexW4360982064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.