ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2023
Esophageal stenting with minimally-invasive surgical intervention for delayed spontaneous esophageal perforation.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic Treatment With Stenting, Cricopharyngeal Myotomy, and Vacuum-Assisted Closure of Iatrogenic Cervical Esophageal Perforation.ACG case reports journal · 2026Article
- The impact of modified esophageal stenting on oral intake in delayed spontaneous esophageal perforation.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Esophageal stenting and endoscopic vacuum therapy for esophageal defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Surgical treatment experiences in two cases of spontaneous esophageal ruptures.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Esophageal perforation management: a single-center experience.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2024Article
- Advances in minimal invasive treatment for esophageal perforation.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Efficacy of esophageal stents as a primary therapeutic option in spontaneous esophageal perforations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spontaneous esophageal perforation is a challenging surgical emergency with significant morbidity and mortality, and timely primary repair carries good outcomes. However, direct repair for a delayed spontaneous esophageal perforation is not always feasible and is associated with high mortality. Esophageal stenting can provide therapeutic benefits in the management of esophageal perforations. In this study, we review our experience with placing esophageal stents in combination with minimally-invasive surgical drainage to treat delayed spontaneous esophageal perforations. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with delayed spontaneous esophageal perforations between September 2018 and March 2021. All patients were treated using a hybrid approach, including esophageal stenting across the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) to reduce continued contamination, gastric decompression with extraluminal sutures to prevent stent migration, early enteral nutrition, and aggressive minimally-invasive thoracoscopic debridement and drainage of infected material. Results: There were 5 patients with delayed spontaneous esophageal perforation treated with this hybrid approach. The mean duration between symptoms and diagnosis was 5 days, and the interval between symptoms and esophageal stent insertion was 7 days. The median time to oral nutrition and to esophageal stent removal was 43 and 66 days. There was no stent migration or hospital mortality. Three patients (60%) had postoperative complications. All patients were successfully resumed on oral nutrition with esophageal preservation. Conclusions: A hybrid approach combining endoscopic esophageal stent placement with extraluminal sutures to prevent stent migration, thoracoscopic decortication with chest tube drainage, gastric decompression, and jejunostomy tube placement for early nutrition was feasible and effective in the treatment of delayed spontaneous esophageal perforations. This technique offers a less invasive treatment approach for a challenging clinical problem which has traditionally carried a high rate of morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.