Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37065438›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2023

Slower-X: reduced efficiency of selection in the early stages of X chromosome evolution.

Andrea Mrnjavac, Ksenia A Khudiakova, Nicholas H Barton, Beatriz Vicoso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. TheScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Sex Chromosome Evolution: Hallmarks and Question Marks.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Review
  10. Reconciling theories of dominance with the relative rates of adaptive substitution on sex chromosomes and autosomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrea MrnjavacInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Am Campus 1, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Ksenia A KhudiakovaInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Am Campus 1, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Nicholas H BartonInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Am Campus 1, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8548-5240
Beatriz VicosoInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Am Campus 1, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4579-8306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differentiated X chromosomes are expected to have higher rates of adaptive divergence than autosomes, if new beneficial mutations are recessive (the "faster-X effect"), largely because these mutations are immediately exposed to selection in males. The evolution of X chromosomes after they stop recombining in males, but before they become hemizygous, has not been well explored theoretically. We use the diffusion approximation to infer substitution rates of beneficial and deleterious mutations under such a scenario. Our results show that selection is less efficient on diploid X loci than on autosomal and hemizygous X loci under a wide range of parameters. This "slower-X" effect is stronger for genes affecting primarily (or only) male fitness, and for sexually antagonistic genes. These unusual dynamics suggest that some of the peculiar features of X chromosomes, such as the differential accumulation of genes with sex-specific functions, may start arising earlier than previously appreciated.

Indexed as

adaptationdegenerationdemasculinizationfaster-X theoryshelteringX chromosomeyoung sex chromosomes

Identifiers

PMID37065438
PMCPMC10091493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.