Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37065426›Full record

ArticleSovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine2022

Combination of Multimodal MRI, Neuronavigation, and Awake Craniotomy in Removing Tumors of Eloquent Areas.

А S Zolotova, М S Evstigneyev, К S Yashin, А Yu Ermolayev, М V Ostapyuk, V M A Al-Madhadjy, V I Zagrekov, N Yu Antonova, М V Shibanova, L Ya Kravets and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Towards Optical Biopsy in Glioma Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

А S ZolotovaStaff Physician, Department of Oncology and Neurosurgery, University Clinic; Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia.
М S EvstigneyevAnesthesiologist-Resuscitator, University Clinic; Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia.
К S YashinNeurosurgeon, University Clinic; Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia; Assistant, Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics, and Neurosurgery; Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia.
А Yu ErmolayevNeurosurgeon, University Clinic; Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia.
М V OstapyukPhD Student, Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics, and Neurosurgery; Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia.
V M A Al-MadhadjyStaff Physician, Department of Oncology and Neurosurgery, University Clinic; Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia.
V I ZagrekovHead of the Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, University Clinic; Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia.
N Yu AntonovaIntern Researcher; National Research University Higher School of Economics, 25/12 Bolshaya Pecherskaya St., Nizhny Novgorod, 603155, Russia.
М V ShibanovaStudent; National Research University Higher School of Economics, 25/12 Bolshaya Pecherskaya St., Nizhny Novgorod, 603155, Russia.
L Ya KravetsProfessor, Chief Researcher of the Neurosurgery Group, University Clinic; Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia.
N E GronskayaDirector of the Language and Brain Center; National Research University Higher School of Economics, 25/12 Bolshaya Pecherskaya St., Nizhny Novgorod, 603155, Russia.
I А MedyanikNeurosurgeon; Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia.
Language Science (South Korea) · KRUniversity Clinic of Traumatology · ATBrain (Germany) · DENational Research University Higher School of Economics · RUPrivolzhsky Research Medical University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Materials and Methods: The results of 30 successive awake surgical interventions performed in 2017-2019 years in patients with tumors of eloquent areas have been analyzed. The main selection criterion for this type of operations was the location of the tumor in the projection or in the immediate proximity to the cortical centers of speech and motion. To minimize the damage, patients underwent functional MRI and DTI tractography at the prehospital stage to identify cortical regions and white matter tracts involved in the motor and language functions; immediately before the operation the acquired data was loaded into the navigation StealthStation S7 (Medtronic, USA) to plan and monitor surgery stages; during the surgery, direct cortical and subcortical stimulation was performed to identify the motor and speech centers (asleep-awake-asleep technique) with neurolinguistic testing. Karnofsky performance status, assessment of the patient's neurological status, frequency of epileptic seizures before and after the operation, the extent of the tumor resection, and the data analysis after the linguistic testing were used to determine the patients' condition and surgery outcomes. Results: Improvement of the general state after the operation has been noted in 30% of patients compared to the preoperative condition, no neurological deficit dynamics has been observed in 33% of patients. Postoperative multimodal MRI showed that total tumor removal was achieved in 37% of cases, subtotal in 40%, partial removal resection in 23% of cases. Conclusion: The combined approach to the brain tumor resection using multimodal MRI, neuronavigation, and awake craniotomy with motor and language areas mapping allows neurosurgeons to minimize the risk of persistent neurological deficit occurrence and provides the possibility to perform maximal resection possible preserving the patients' functional status. The presented methodology is reproducible, permitting one to expand the options of surgical treatment when lesions are localized in eloquent areas.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeuronavigationBrain MappingCraniotomyHumansLanguageMagnetic Resonance ImagingWakefulnessawake craniotomyeloquent areasintracerebral tumorsmultimodal MRIneuronavigation

Identifiers

PMID37065426
PMCPMC10090929
OpenAlexW4225137794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.