Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37065239›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023

Status of animal health biosecurity measures of dairy farms in urban and peri-urban areas of central Ethiopia.

Nebyou Moje, Hika Waktole, Rediet Kassahun, Bekele Megersa, Milkessa T Chomen, Samson Leta, Mulu Debela, Kebede Amenu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antimicrobial resistance profiles ofJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nebyou MojeCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Addis Ababa University, Bishoftu, Ethiopia.
Hika WaktoleCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Addis Ababa University, Bishoftu, Ethiopia.
Rediet KassahunCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Addis Ababa University, Bishoftu, Ethiopia.
Bekele MegersaCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Addis Ababa University, Bishoftu, Ethiopia.
Milkessa T ChomenDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Samson LetaCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Addis Ababa University, Bishoftu, Ethiopia.
Mulu DebelaDepartment of Rural Development and Agricultural Extension, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Kebede AmenuCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Addis Ababa University, Bishoftu, Ethiopia.
Addis Ababa University · ETAmbo University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethiopian dairy farming has many constraints including disease and lack of appropriate biosecurity measures. With this into consideration, a cross-sectional survey was carried out from November 2021 to April 2022 to determine the animal health biosecurity status of dairy farms and investigate the sociodemographic characteristics of livestock keepers on dairy farm management. A face-to-face questionnaire survey using an online application was used to collect data. The interview involved a total of 380 dairy farms located in six towns in central Ethiopia. The results showed that out of the surveyed farms, 97.6% missed footbaths at their gate points, 87.4% lacked isolation areas for either sick or newly introduced cattle, and 83.4% did not check the health status or quarantine newly introduced cattle. Furthermore, written formal record-keepings on animal health was uncommon, except for a few farms (7.9%). However, nearly all of the respondents (97.9%) gave medical treatments for sick cattle, and 57.1% of them vaccinated their herds regularly during the past 12 months before the survey. Hygienic aspects of the farms showed that 77.4% of the dairy farms appeared to clean the barn on a daily basis. However, 53.2% of respondents did not utilize personal protective equipment while cleaning their farms. A quarter of the dairy farmer (25.8%) avoided mixing their cattle with other herds, and 32.9% of them have implemented isolation of sick animals. In general, the animal health biosecurity assessment of the farms showed that most of the dairy farms (79.5%) earned unacceptable biosecurity levels (score of ≤ 50%), whereas the remaining 20.5% of dairy farms had received a score of >50% ("acceptable level"). The gender of dairy farmers (χ

Indexed as

animal healthbiosecuritymanagement practicessmallholder dairy farmurban and peri-urban

Identifiers

PMID37065239
PMCPMC10090322
OpenAlexW4361202474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.