Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37065202›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2023

Maternal vaginal microbiome composition does not affect development of the infant gut microbiome in early life.

Scott J Dos Santos, Zahra Pakzad, Arianne Y K Albert, Chelsea N Elwood, Kirsten Grabowska, Matthew G Links, Jennifer A Hutcheon, Evelyn J Maan, Amee R Manges, Tim J Dumonceaux and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Transformation ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Scott J Dos SantosDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Zahra PakzadDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Arianne Y K AlbertWomen's Health Research Institute, B.C. Women's Hopsital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Chelsea N ElwoodWomen's Health Research Institute, B.C. Women's Hopsital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kirsten GrabowskaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Matthew G LinksDepartment of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Jennifer A HutcheonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Evelyn J MaanWomen's Health Research Institute, B.C. Women's Hopsital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Amee R MangesSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Tim J DumonceauxAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Zoë G HodgsonMidwifery Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Janet LyonsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Sheona M Mitchell-FosterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Soren GanttCentre de Recherche du CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, QC, Canada.
K S JosephDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Julie E Van SchalkwykDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Janet E HillDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Deborah M MoneyDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAWomen's Health Research Institute · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CAAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CABC Centre for Disease Control · CACentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Birth mode has been implicated as a major factor influencing neonatal gut microbiome development, and it has been assumed that lack of exposure to the maternal vaginal microbiome is responsible for gut dysbiosis among caesarean-delivered infants. Consequently, practices to correct dysbiotic gut microbiomes, such as vaginal seeding, have arisen while the effect of the maternal vaginal microbiome on that of the infant gut remains unknown. We conducted a longitudinal, prospective cohort study of 621 Canadian pregnant women and their newborn infants and collected pre-delivery maternal vaginal swabs and infant stool samples at 10-days and 3-months of life. Using

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaCanadaFecesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyProspective Studiesbirth modecpn60infant gutinfant stool microbiomemicrobiomevaginal microbiomevaginal seeding

Identifiers

PMID37065202
PMCPMC10097898
OpenAlexW4361277004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.