Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37065153›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

Actinobacteria from Arctic and Atlantic deep-sea sediments-Biodiversity and bioactive potential.

Inês Ribeiro, Jorge T Antunes, Diogo A M Alexandrino, Maria Paola Tomasino, Eduarda Almeida, Ana Hilário, Ralph Urbatzka, Pedro N Leão, Ana P Mucha, Maria F Carvalho

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. EpibioticPeerJ · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Inês RibeiroCIIMAR - Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Jorge T AntunesCIIMAR - Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Diogo A M AlexandrinoCIIMAR - Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Maria Paola TomasinoCIIMAR - Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Eduarda AlmeidaCIIMAR - Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Ana HilárioCentre for Environmental and Marine Studies and Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Ralph UrbatzkaCIIMAR - Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Pedro N LeãoCIIMAR - Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Ana P MuchaCIIMAR - Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Maria F CarvalhoCIIMAR - Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Aveiro · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The deep-sea covers over 70% of the Earth's surface and harbors predominantly uncharacterized bacterial communities. Actinobacteria are the major prokaryotic source of bioactive natural products that find their way into drug discovery programs, and the deep-sea is a promising source of biotechnologically relevant actinobacteria. Previous studies on actinobacteria in deep-sea sediments were either regionally restricted or did not combine a community characterization with the analysis of their bioactive potential. Here we characterized the actinobacterial communities of upper layers of deep-sea sediments from the Arctic and the Atlantic (Azores and Madeira) ocean basins, employing 16S rRNA metabarcoding, and studied the biosynthetic potential of cultivable actinobacteria retrieved from those samples. Metabarcoding analysis showed that the actinobacterial composition varied between the sampled regions, with higher abundance in the Arctic samples but higher diversity in the Atlantic ones. Twenty actinobacterial genera were detected using metabarcoding, as a culture-independent method, while culture-dependent methods only allowed the identification of nine genera. Isolation of actinobacteria resulted on the retrieval of 44 isolates, mainly associated with

Indexed as

actinobacteriaanti-canceranti-inflammatoryantimicrobialdeep-sea sedimentsmetabarcoding

Identifiers

PMID37065153
PMCPMC10100589
OpenAlexW4361270165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.