Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37065115›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2023

Trends in forensic microbiology: From classical methods to deep learning.

Huiya Yuan, Ziwei Wang, Zhi Wang, Fuyuan Zhang, Dawei Guan, Rui Zhao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Huiya YuanDepartment of Forensic Analytical Toxicology, China Medical University School of Forensic Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Ziwei WangDepartment of Forensic Pathology, China Medical University School of Forensic Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Zhi WangDepartment of Forensic Pathology, China Medical University School of Forensic Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Fuyuan ZhangDepartment of Forensic Pathology, China Medical University School of Forensic Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Dawei GuanLiaoning Province Key Laboratory of Forensic Bio-Evidence Science, Shenyang, China.
Rui ZhaoLiaoning Province Key Laboratory of Forensic Bio-Evidence Science, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forensic microbiology has been widely used in the diagnosis of causes and manner of death, identification of individuals, detection of crime locations, and estimation of postmortem interval. However, the traditional method, microbial culture, has low efficiency, high consumption, and a low degree of quantitative analysis. With the development of high-throughput sequencing technology, advanced bioinformatics, and fast-evolving artificial intelligence, numerous machine learning models, such as RF, SVM, ANN, DNN, regression, PLS, ANOSIM, and ANOVA, have been established with the advancement of the microbiome and metagenomic studies. Recently, deep learning models, including the convolutional neural network (CNN) model and CNN-derived models, improve the accuracy of forensic prognosis using object detection techniques in microorganism image analysis. This review summarizes the application and development of forensic microbiology, as well as the research progress of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) based on microbial genome sequencing and microbial images, and provided a future outlook on forensic microbiology.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningforensic medicineforensic microbiologymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID37065115
PMCPMC10098119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.