ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2023
Tradition or Innovation in Sternal Dehiscence Repair: Robicsek Versus Titanium Plate.
Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Sternotomy is still the most commonly used incision in cardiac surgery. Sternal complications are seen at a rate of 0.5% to 6.1%. Sternal dehiscence increases morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. To prevent dehiscence, the search for alternative sternum closure methods continues today. Titanium plates produced for this purpose can also be used in patients who are re-operated due to sternal dehiscence. In our study, we investigated the effects of titanium plate repair and robicsek repair on the results in patients who were reoperated due to sternal dehiscence. Methods: Thirty-four patients who underwent reoperation due to sternal detachment in our hospital between September 2013 and December 2020 and had no signs of infection in the pre-operative period were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into three groups according to the surgical method applied. These groups are as follows: Group 1: The cases in which the robicsek method was used, Group 2: the cases in which the titanium plate method was used, and Group 3: The cases where the robicsek + titanium plate methods were used together. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of basic demographic characteristics and risk factors, leading to sternal dehiscence. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of mortality and length of hospital stay. Considering the infection rates in the post-operative period, 20% and 21.4% post-operative infections were detected in Group 1 and Group 3, respectively, while 70% post-operative infection was observed in Group 2, which was repaired only with the Robicsek technique (p<0.05). Conclusion: As supported by most studies in the literature, titanium plate application provides a superior sternum stabilization compared to the classical wire cerclage method. When evaluated in terms of cost-effectiveness, titanium plate method can be applied in high-risk patients in terms of sternal dehiscence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.