Number and Syllabification of Following Consonants Influence Use of Long Versus Short Vowels in English Disyllables.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. All together now: Random Forests analysis reveals the joint impact of multiple statistical regularities on eye-movements during reading.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025
   Article
2. The role of context in the reading of English vowels: Evidence from ‹s› clusters.Glossa psycholinguistics · 2025
   Article
3. Spelling-to-sound translation for English disyllables: Use of long and short vowels before single medial consonants.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2023
   Article
4. Stochastic Model for Phonemes Uncovers an Author-Dependency of Their Usage.PloS one · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as