Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37064804›Full record

ArticleSovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine2022

Interstitial Glucose Metabolism Monitoring as an Additional Method for Objective Assessment of Donor Liver, Prediction and Immediate Diagnosis of Early Graft Dysfunction.

A I Sushkov, S E Voskanyan, V S Rudakov, M V Popov, K K Gubarev, D S Svetlakova, A I Artemiev

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A I SushkovHead of the Laboratory of Advanced Surgical Technologies; Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of FMBA of Russia, 23 Marshal Novikov St., Moscow, 123098, Russia.
S E VoskanyanProfessor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Deputy Chief Physician for Surgical Care - Head of the Center for Surgery and Transplantology; Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of FMBA of Russia, 23 Marshal Novikov St., Moscow, 123098, Russia.
V S RudakovSurgeon, Surgery Department for Human Organ and (or) Tissue Donation Coordination; Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of FMBA of Russia, 23 Marshal Novikov St., Moscow, 123098, Russia.
M V PopovJunior Researcher, Laboratory of Advanced Surgical Technologies; Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of FMBA of Russia, 23 Marshal Novikov St., Moscow, 123098, Russia.
K K GubarevHead of the Surgery Department for Human Organ and (or) Tissue Donation Coordination; Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of FMBA of Russia, 23 Marshal Novikov St., Moscow, 123098, Russia.
D S SvetlakovaSurgeon, Surgery Department for Human Organ and (or) Tissue Donation Coordination; Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Advanced Surgical Technologies; Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of FMBA of Russia, 23 Marshal Novikov St., Moscow, 123098, Russia.
A I ArtemievHead of Surgery Department No.2; Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of FMBA of Russia, 23 Marshal Novikov St., Moscow, 123098, Russia.
State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation - Federal Medical Biophysical Center named after A.I. Burnazyan · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current clinical practice of assessing the quality and suitability of a donor liver for human transplantation does not exclude cases of primary graft dysfunction of the transplanted organ and, at the same time, leads to an unreasonable refusal to transplant a significant number of functionally suitable organs. In this regard, searching for new methods for additional objective assessment and monitoring of the state of donor organs in the peritransplant period is relevant. Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational single-center study included 32 cases of liver transplantation. Along with standard methods for assessing the initial function of grafts during the first week after surgery, interstitial (in the transplanted liver) concentrations of glucose and its metabolites were monitored. In 18 cases, the interstitial glucose metabolism was also studied during static cold storage (SCS). Results: With the development of early allograft dysfunction (EAD), compared with the uneventful post-transplant period, statistically significantly higher interstitial lactate concentrations were observed as early as 3 h after reperfusion: 12.3 [10.1; 15.6] mmol/L versus 7.2 [3.9; 9.9] mmol/L (p=0.003). A value above 8.8 mmol/L may be considered as a criterion for the immediate diagnosis of EAD (sensitivity - 89%, specificity - 65%).Interstitial lactate concentration at the end of SCS and the area under the "lactate concentration-SCS duration" curve were associated with the initial graft function. Values of these parameters greater than 15.4 mmol/L and 76.1 mmol/L·h, respectively, with a sensitivity of 100% in both cases and a specificity of 77 and 85%, may be used to assess the risk of primary EAD. Conclusion: Monitoring of interstitial concentrations of glucose and its metabolites, primarily, lactate, is an objective additional method for the assessment of the donor liver viability both during SCS and in the early postoperative period.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationGlucoseGraft SurvivalHumansLactatesLiverLiving DonorsRetrospective StudiesGlucoseLactatesearly allograft dysfunctionliver transplantationmicrodialysisprimary non-function graftstatic cold storage

Identifiers

PMID37064804
PMCPMC10090915
OpenAlexW4283726629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.