ArticleAJOG global reports2023
Cesarean delivery and risk of HIV vertical transmission in Southern Brazil, 2008-2018.
Article in AJOG global reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk Factors for Vertical Transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Angola: A Case-Control Study.Portuguese journal of public health · 2026Review
- Socio-ecological Determinants of Detectable Viremia among Pregnant People Living with HIV in South Brazil: The Role of Stimulant Use Disorder and Homelessness.AIDS and behavior · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChildbirth via cesarean delivery can prevent intrapartum vertical transmission for women who are not virally suppressed at the time of delivery. Few studies have compared cesarean delivery trends between women living with HIV and women without HIV and have examined the role of cesarean delivery in the prevention of vertical transmission in the era of potent combination antiretroviral therapy.
objectiveWe hypothesized that the cesarean delivery rate is high in women living with HIV compared with women without HIV and that cesarean delivery usage decreases over time among women living with HIV with advances in combined antiretroviral therapy in a country with a high national cesarean delivery rate. This study aimed (1) to evaluate cesarean delivery trends in women with and without HIV and (2) to examine its role in preventing vertical transmission among women living with HIV in a setting of free, universal combined antiretroviral therapy coverage in a retrospective cohort of nearly 56,000 deliveries at a major referral institution in a city with the highest prevalence of maternal HIV in Brazil. STUDY
designData from maternal-infant pairs from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2018, were extracted. Cesarean delivery rates were compared using the Pearson chi-square test. Cesarean delivery predictors were evaluated by multivariate log-linear Poisson regression using a generalized estimating equations approach. HIV viral suppression was defined as a viral load of <1000 copies/ml at delivery. HIV vertical transmission was determined following national guidelines.
resultsOver 11 years, 48,688 pregnancies occurred in 40,375 women; HIV seroprevalence was 2.7%; 18,886 cesarean deliveries (38.8%) were performed; 47.7% of women living with HIV and 38.6% of women without HIV underwent cesarean delivery (
conclusionIn the HIV epicenter of Brazil, women living with HIV with vertical transmission had fewer surgical deliveries, likely because of the use of potent combination antiretroviral therapy. Nearly half of the women living with HIV with an unknown viral load did not undergo cesarean delivery, a potential missed opportunity for the prevention of HIV vertical transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.