Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37064779›Full record

ArticleNeurophotonics2023

Evaluation of residual cognition in patients with disorders of consciousness based on functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Juanning Si, Yi Yang, Long Xu, Tianshuai Xu, Hao Liu, Yujin Zhang, Rixing Jing, Jinglian Li, Dongdong Wang, Sijin Wu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurophotonics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Juanning SiBeijing Information Science and Technology University, School of Instrumentation Science and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2746-5612
Yi YangBeijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing, China.
Long XuBeijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing, China.
Tianshuai XuBeijing Information Science and Technology University, School of Instrumentation Science and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Beijing, China.
Hao LiuChinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Automation, Brainnetome Center, Beijing, China.
Yujin ZhangChinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Automation, Brainnetome Center, Beijing, China.
Rixing JingBeijing Information Science and Technology University, School of Instrumentation Science and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Beijing, China.
Jinglian LiSanhe Yanjiao Fuhe First Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Langfang, China.
Dongdong WangSanhe Yanjiao Fuhe First Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Langfang, China.
Sijin WuBeijing Information Science and Technology University, School of Instrumentation Science and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9722-9148
Jianghong HeBeijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing, China.
Beijing Information Science & Technology University · CNBeijing Tian Tan Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNInstitute of Automation · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Accurate evaluation of consciousness in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (DOC) is critical for designing therapeutic plans, determining rehabilitative services, and predicting prognosis. Effective ways for detecting consciousness in patients with DOC are still needed. Aim: Evaluation of the residual awareness in patients with DOC and investigation of the spatiotemporal differences in the hemodynamic responses between the minimally conscious state (MCS) and the unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) groups using active command-driven motor imagery (MI) tasks. Approach: In this study, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to measure the changes of hemodynamic responses in 19 patients with DOC (9 MCS and 10 UWS) using active command-driven MI tasks. The characteristics of the hemodynamic responses were extracted to compare the differences between the MCS and UWS groups. Moreover, the correlations between the hemodynamic responses and the clinical behavioral evaluations were also studied. Results: The results showed significant differences in the spatiotemporal distribution of the hemodynamic responses between the MCS and UWS groups. For the patients with MCS, significant increases in task-evoked hemodynamic responses occurred during the "YES" questions of the command-driven MI tasks. Importantly, these changes were significantly correlated with their coma-recovery scale-revised (CRS-R) scores. However, for the patients with UWS, no significant changes of the hemodynamic responses were found. Additionally, the results did not show any statistical correlation between the hemodynamic responses and their CRS-R scores. Conclusions: The fNIRS-based command-driven MI tasks can be used as a promising tool for detecting residual awareness in patients with DOC. We hope that the findings and the active paradigm used in this study will provide useful insights into the diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis of this challenging patient population.

Indexed as

disorders of consciousnessfunctional near-infrared spectroscopyhemodynamic responsemotor imageryresidual awareness

Identifiers

PMID37064779
PMCPMC10091901
OpenAlexW4365148941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.