ArticleCureus2023
Cervicogenic Angina and Dyspnea Secondary to Cervical Radiculopathy.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of manufactured Chinese herbal formula for cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Combining pulsed radiofrequency and low-temperature plasma ablation for refractory cervicogenic angina after percutaneous coronary intervention: a case report.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Application value of Ultrasound-Guided cervical nerve root block test before percutaneous nucleoplasty in the treatment of patients with cervical chest pain: A retrospective study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025Article
- Optimizing Airway Function Through Craniofacial and Cervical Manipulations and Emergency-Anesthesia Maneuvers: Applications in Airway Function Enhancement, Pneumonia, and Asthma-Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Pediatric Text Neck Syndrome.Cureus · 2023Article
- Association between quantitative cervical cord compression metrics and upper extremity impairments in degenerative cervical myelopathy: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervicogenic angina and dyspnea are conditions characterized by chest discomfort and breathing difficulties that resemble angina pectoris and dyspnea of cardiac origin. However, this condition is caused by cervical spine pathology, cervical spondylosis, and radiculopathy. This case study reports a 66-year-old man who presented with cervicogenic angina and dyspnea due to cervical radiculopathy to a chiropractic clinic. The patient underwent a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation, including taking the patient's history, a physical examination, and radiological investigations, which demonstrated cervical spine involvement consistent with a cervicogenic origin of the pain. The patient's angina-like symptoms and dyspnea improved significantly after chiropractic manipulation of the spine, soft tissue mobilization, and other manual therapies. Accurate diagnosis is essential to minimize unnecessary cardiac interventions and ensure proper therapy for underlying cervical spine problems. This case demonstrates the necessity of conservative management, such as chiropractic care, for patients presenting with cervicogenic angina and dyspnea, particularly when a diagnostic assessment reveals cervical spinal involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.