Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37064681›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Experience, facilitators, and barriers to the implementation of a multicomponent programme in older people living in the community, +AGIL Barcelona: A qualitative study.

Olga Canet-Vélez, Lilian Solis-Navarro, Mercè Sitjà-Rabert, Laura Mónica Pérez, Judith Roca, Luis Soto-Bagaria, Rodrigo Torres-Castro, Francisco Díaz-Gallego, Jordi Vilaró, Marco Inzitari

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06836167 (+ AGIL Barcelona), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06836167 narecruitingnot on this map

+ AGIL Barcelona: Integrated Care for Community-Dwelling Frail Older Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorParc Sanitari Pere VirgiliRan2022 to 2025Enrolled396ConditionsFrailty, Older Adults, Healthy AgingArmsexercise promotion, review medication, promoting healthy aging, against social isolation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Olga Canet-VélezFacultat Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain.
Lilian Solis-NavarroPrograma de Doctorat-Facultat Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain.
Mercè Sitjà-RabertFacultat Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain.
Laura Mónica PérezResearch on Aging, Frailty and Care Transitions in Barcelona (REFiT-BCN), Parc Sanitari Pere Virgili and Vall d'Hebron Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.
Judith RocaDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain.
Luis Soto-BagariaResearch on Aging, Frailty and Care Transitions in Barcelona (REFiT-BCN), Parc Sanitari Pere Virgili and Vall d'Hebron Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.
Rodrigo Torres-CastroDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Francisco Díaz-GallegoInstitut Català de la Salut, Gerència de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi VilaróFacultat Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain.
Marco InzitariResearch on Aging, Frailty and Care Transitions in Barcelona (REFiT-BCN), Parc Sanitari Pere Virgili and Vall d'Hebron Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The +AGIL Barcelona programme is a multicomponent care intervention for frail older adults (FOAs) living in the community. To improve the programme, it is essential to investigate the experience of all participants. Our objective was to explore the perspective of FOA and professionals about the barriers, facilitators, and improvement elements of the development of the +AGIL Barcelona programme. Qualitative descriptive approach. Were included FOA and professionals who participated in the +AGIL Barcelona programme. Methods: Three focus groups and four interviews were conducted. These were analyzed following the qualitative method of content analysis. The criteria of scientific rigor of credibility, dependence, and transferability were ensured throughout the study. Results: Three themes and seven sub-themes were developed: facilitators (positive experience and perceived benefits), barriers (self-perceived health status, digital divide, and continuity of the programme at home), and improvements elements (programme continuity and adaptation of technology). All the participants felt satisfied, highlighting aspects such as interpersonal relationships and social contact, face-to-face sessions guided by a physiotherapist, and the functional improvement achieved. Some of the difficulties were the self-perception of frailty, the need for technological support, and continuing the exercise programme at home. Conclusion: The FOA who participated in the +AGIL Barcelona programme perceived direct benefits for their health and physical condition due to the development of self-confidence by being able to perform physical exercise despite their baseline condition, and the professionals experienced an improvement in the quality of care due to work in a multidisciplinary team.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyFrailtyAgedExerciseHumanscommunity-integrated careexerciseexercise implementation programmeexercise implementation programme frailtyfrailty

Identifiers

PMID37064681
PMCPMC10097946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.