Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37064672›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Characteristics and outcomes of peer consultations for assisted dying request assessments: Cross-sectional survey study among attending physicians.

Stijn Vissers, Sigrid Dierickx, Luc Deliens, Freddy Mortier, Joachim Cohen, Kenneth Chambaere

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stijn VissersEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Universiteit Gent, Brussels, Belgium.
Sigrid DierickxEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Universiteit Gent, Brussels, Belgium.
Luc DeliensEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Universiteit Gent, Brussels, Belgium.
Freddy MortierEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Universiteit Gent, Brussels, Belgium.
Joachim CohenEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Universiteit Gent, Brussels, Belgium.
Kenneth ChambaereEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Universiteit Gent, Brussels, Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BEGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In most jurisdictions where assisted dying practices are legal, attending physicians must consult another practitioner to assess the patient's eligibility. Consequently, in some jurisdictions, they can rely on the expertise of trained assisted dying consultants (trained consultants). However, these peer consultations remain under-researched. We examined the characteristics and outcomes of peer consultations to assess an assisted dying request with trained consultants, and explored how these characteristics influence the performance of assisted dying. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in 2019-2020 in Belgium among attending physicians who had consulted a trained consultant for an assisted dying request assessment ( Results: The valid response rate was 56% (502/903). The vast majority of attending physicians (92%) who had consulted a trained consultant were general practitioners. In more than half of the consultations (57%), the patient was diagnosed with cancer. In 66%, the patient was aged 70 or older. Reported as the patients' most important reasons to request assisted dying: suffering without prospect of improving in 49% of the consultations, loss of dignity in 11%, pain in 9%, and tiredness of life in 9%. In the vast majority of consultations (85%), the attending physician consulted the trained consultant because of the expertise, and in nearly half of the consultations (46%) because of the independence. In more than nine out of ten consultations (91%), the consultant gave a positive advice: i.e., substantive requirements for assisted dying were met. Eight out of ten consultations were followed by assisted dying. The likelihood of assisted dying was higher in consultations in which loss of dignity, loss of independence in daily living, or general weakness or tiredness were reasons for the request. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the peer consultation practice with trained consultants is most often embedded in a primary care setting. Moreover, our study corroborates previous research in that assisted dying is performed relatively less frequently in patients with cancer and more often in patients with general deterioration. Our findings suggest that attending physicians hold peer consultations with trained consultants to endorse their own decision-making and to request additional support.

Indexed as

EuthanasiaGeneral PractitionersNeoplasmsSuicide, AssistedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansReferral and Consultationassisted dyingBelgiumend-of-life careeuthanasiamedical decision-makingmedical end-of-life practicepeer consultationphysicians

Identifiers

PMID37064672
PMCPMC10090406
OpenAlexW4361294455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.