ArticleBuilding and environment2023
Human personal air pollution clouds in a naturally ventilated office during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Building and environment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parameterising the effect of human occupancy and kinetic energy on indoor air pollution.NPJ climate and atmospheric science · 2026Article
- Application and validation of a wearable monitor for assessing time- and location-resolved exposures to particulate matter in California's Central Valley.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2025Article
- Article
- Nanocluster Aerosols from Ozone-Human Chemistry Are Dominated by Squalene-Ozone Reactions.Environmental science & technology letters · 2024Article
- Influence of Ventilation on Formation and Growth of 1-20 nm Particles via Ozone-Human Chemistry.Environmental science & technology · 2024Article
- Physiology or Psychology: What Drives Human Emissions of Carbon Dioxide and Ammonia?Environmental science & technology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Personal cloud, termed as the difference in air pollutant concentrations between breathing zone and room sites, represents the bias in approximating personal inhalation exposure that is linked to accuracy of health risk assessment. This study performed a two-week field experiment in a naturally ventilated office during the COVID-19 pandemic to assess occupants' exposure to common air pollutants and to determine factors contributing to the personal cloud effect. During occupied periods, indoor average concentrations of endotoxin (0.09 EU/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.