ArticleOman medical journal2023
Histopathological Results and the Outcome of Women Who Underwent Postpartum Evacuation and Pelvic Ultrasound Scan.
Article in Oman medical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the proportion of women who underwent postpartum evacuation and were histopathologically confirmed to have retained products of conception (RPOC), compare the reliability of histopathology and ultrasound (US) in determining the presence of RPOC, and assess the maternal complications associated with postpartum evacuation. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on all women who delivered and had postpartum evacuation at a tertiary teaching hospital in Oman over 11 years from May 2009 to May 2020. The participants were divided into two groups based on their histopathology results. McNemar test was used to compare the sonographic results with the histopathological findings. Results: A total of 151 women were included in this study. The diagnosis of RPOC was confirmed in histopathological reports of 64 (42.4%) women (group 1) but not in 87 (57.6%) women (group 2). There was no significant difference between the two groups in maternal characteristics. Parameters of clinical presentation including fever and abdominal pain were significantly different between the two groups ( Conclusions: Diagnosis of postpartum RPOC is challenging. Our results highlighted the complexity of diagnosing RPOC. Special training is needed for doctors to diagnose RPOC from transvaginal scans. A multicenter study in Oman with a larger sample size is recommended to confirm our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.