ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2023
Is T-tube drainage no longer needed for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration? A retrospective analysis and literature review.
Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The trans T-tube cholangial drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage for the treatment of bile leakage at the biliary-enteric anastomosis: a retrospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Clinical application of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in laparoscopic cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration and J-Tube drainage.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Improved outcomes and prognostic risk prediction for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure versus T-tube drainage.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure could be safely performed among elderly patients with choledocholithiasis.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Primary closure (PC) following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is increasingly becoming a safe and effective option for choledocholithiasis. However, whether T-tube drainage (TTD) is no longer needed for LCBDE remains under debate. Aim: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of PC and TTD following LCBDE, and discuss their indications for selection of the procedure, combined with a literature review. Material and methods: 826 consecutive patients who underwent LCBDE with PC or TTD at Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital were reviewed. The clinical data of postoperative outcomes were compared and analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for potential baseline confounding. Results: Of these patients, 796 underwent PC and 30 underwent TTD. Twenty-eight (3.52%) cases occurred in bile leakage in PC, and all of them were treated successfully with conservative therapy. Additionally, there was no evidence of bile duct stricture and death in all PC cases. TTD was mainly performed in patients with a higher rate of cholangitis (50.00%), large stones (26.67%), impacted stones (23.33%) and laser lithotripsy (26.67%). After PSM, 23 cases with PC and TTD were included. In the PC group, the operative time, postoperative stay, hospital expenses and recurrence rate were significantly shorter or less than in the TTD group. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in postoperative drainage time, complications, reoperations and bile duct stricture rate. Conclusions: PC following LCBDE is safe and effective for choledocholithiasis. TTD is a safe alternative method for bile duct closure in certain special cases, such as acute cholangitis, large stones, impacted stones, and laser lithotripsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.