ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2023
Short-term outcomes of transvaginal specimen extraction versus transumbilical specimen extraction following totally laparoscopic gastrectomy in female patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel transoral extraction technique in robotic resection of gastroduodenal tumors: a case series.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) laparoscopic surgery is emerging as a new and promising technique, especially in gastric cancer (GC). Aim: To analyze the difference between transvaginal and transumbilical specimen extraction following totally laparoscopic gastrectomy (TLG). Material and methods: Between January 2016 and July 2021, 37 consecutive female patients with GC who underwent either natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) or TLG at our center were included and analyzed. Results: In total, 12 patients underwent NOSES, and 25 patients underwent TLG. The NOSES group had a shorter operative time (239.3 ±21.5 vs. 256.1 ±21.2 min, p = 0.031) and shorter specimen extraction time (17.0 ±4.2 vs. 30.8 ±4.3 min, p < 0.01). No significant difference was observed in the comparison of the radical validity including estimated blood loss, the number of harvested LNs and the comparisons of distal and proximal margin. In the postoperative recovery comparisons, the NOSES group had a shorter time to first fluids (3.9 ±0.5 vs. 5.6 ±1.2 days, p < 0.01), and time to starting a soft diet (5.6 ±0.7 vs. 7.7 ±1.7 days, p < 0.01). Postoperative pain in the NOSES group was significantly less. Postoperative hospital stay days in the NOSES group were fewer (10.2 ±2.2 vs. 12.4 ±2.9 days, p = 0.030). Overall, the postoperative complications were similar between the two groups (p = 0.438). When more cases were included, the results were similar. NOSES reduced hospital costs for GC patients, and it also applied to the premenopausal patients. Conclusions: NOSES was a safer and more reliable method as compared to transumbilical specimen extraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.