ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2023
Bacteriological and oncological safety of complete laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer without incision anastomosis based on propensity-matched scores.
Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Music therapy combined with anesthesia recovery care boosts anesthesia recovery in colorectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Complete laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer without incision anastomosis is performed by means of natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE), which avoids a large abdominal wall incision. Although this procedure is increasingly practiced, it is still underdeveloped, one reason being that controversy still exists regarding bacteriological and oncological safety. Aim: To demonstrate the safety of complete laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer without incision anastomosis in bacteriology and oncology. Material and methods: This study was a retrospective study with prospectively collected data. This study continuously collected 420 patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery in our hospital from January 2018 to March 2022. According to the different surgical methods, they were divided into the NOSE group (the natural orifice specimen extraction group) and the N-NOSE group (specimen removed through abdominal wall auxiliary incision). The two groups were matched 1 : 1 using the propensity score matching (PSM) method to balance at baseline. Bacteriological and oncological outcomes, short-term complications, and long-term prognosis were compared between the two groups. Results: One hundred and eighty-four of the 420 included patients were successfully matched. The differences in gender, body mass index, T stage, N stage, and diabetes status between the two groups after matching were not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in oncological outcomes, short-term complications, and 2-year postoperative disease-free survival between the two groups. There was no significant correlation between positive bacterial culture results and intra-abdominal infection. Conclusions: Compared with traditional laparoscopic surgery, complete laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer without incision anastomosis has satisfactory bacteriological and oncological effects and is worthy of further clinical promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.