Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37064557›Full record

ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2023

Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus sinus laser therapy (SiLaT) for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus.

Cenk Ersavas, Basak Erginel, Fatih Yanar, İbrahim Fethi Azamat, Fatih Taskesen, Feryal Gun Soysal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Use of the laser in the pilonidal sinus alone or in combination with phenol.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cenk ErsavasDepartment of General Surgery, Medical Faculty, Istanbul Arel University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Basak ErginelDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Fatih YanarDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
İbrahim Fethi AzamatDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Fatih TaskesenDepartment of General Surgery, Medical Faculty, Uskudar University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Feryal Gun SoysalDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul University · TRIstanbul Arel University · TRÜsküdar University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: New surgical treatment methods are being investigated in sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease. Minimal invasive methods such as endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) and sinus laser therapy (SiLaT) have promising results and advantages of laparoscopic surgery. Aim: To compare the efficiency and safety of EPSIT with SiLaT. Material and methods: Seventy-three patients with pilonidal sinus who had undergone EPSIT or SiLaT within 2 years were evaluated retrospectively. Data of patients' demographics, complications and postoperative course were collected and compared between the two groups. Results: We analyzed seventy-three patients who underwent EPSIT or SiLaT, with a mean age of 23.4 ±8.4 (12-46) years and body mass index (BMI) of 25.5 ±4.5 (18-38) kg/m Conclusions: Both methods have similar early and late complications. The duration of need for analgesic usage was shorter in EPSIT patients.

Indexed as

endoscopiclaserpilonidal

Identifiers

PMID37064557
PMCPMC10091928
OpenAlexW4317422561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.