Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37064402›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023

Ultrasound-based prediction of preoperative core biopsy categories in solid breast tumor using machine learning.

Ting Liang, Junhui Shen, Jiexin Wang, Weilin Liao, Zhi Zhang, Juanjuan Liu, Zhanwu Feng, Shufang Pei, Kebing Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ting Liang *Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Junhui Shen *Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiexin Wang *Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Weilin LiaoSchool of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhi ZhangSchool of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Juanjuan LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhanwu FengDepartment of Ultrasound, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shufang PeiDepartment of Ultrasound, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Kebing LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR BI-RADS) used with ultrasonography cannot guide the individual management of solid breast tumors, but preoperative core biopsy categories (CBCs) can. We aimed to use machine learning to analyze clinical and ultrasonic features for predicting CBCs and to aid in the development of a new ultrasound (US) imaging reporting system for solid tumors of the breast. Methods: This retrospective study included women with solid breast tumors who underwent US-guided core needle biopsy from March 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019. All patients were randomly assigned to a training or validation cohort (7:3 ratio). CBC was predicted using 5 machine learning models: random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest-neighbor (KNN), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and ridge regression (RR). In the validation cohort, the area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy were ascertained for every algorithm. Based on AUC values, the optimal algorithm was determined, and the features' importance was depicted. Results: A total of 1,082 female patients were included (age range, 12-96 years; mean age ± standard deviation, 42.22±13.37 years). The proportion of the 4 CBCs was 4% (44/1,185) for the B1 group, 60% (714/1,185) for the B2 group, 5% (57/1,185) for the B3 group, and 31% (370/1,185) for the B5 group. In the validation cohort, AUCs of the optimal algorithm constructed RF were 0.78, 0.88, 0.64, and 0.92 for B1, B2, B3, and B5, respectively, with an accuracy of 0.82. Conclusions: Machine learning could strongly predict CBC, particularly in B2 and B5 categories of solid breast tumors, with RF being the optimal machine learning model.

Indexed as

core biopsy categories (CBCs)machine learningpredictionsolid breast tumorUltrasound (US)

Identifiers

PMID37064402
PMCPMC10102795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.