Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37064364›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023

Combining autoencoder with clustering analysis for anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans.

Peng Huang, Hui Yan, Zhiyue Song, Yingjie Xu, Zhihui Hu, Jianrong Dai

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peng Huang *Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Hui Yan *Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhiyue SongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yingjie XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhihui HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jianrong DaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To develop an unsupervised anomaly detection method to identify suspicious error-prone treatment plans in radiotherapy. Methods: A total of 577 treatment plans of breast cancer patients were used in this study. They were labeled as either normal or abnormal plans by experienced clinicians. Multiple features of each plan were extracted and selected by the learning algorithms. The training set consisted of feature samples from 400 normal plans and the testing set consisted of feature samples from 158 normal plans and 19 abnormal plans. Using the k-means clustering algorithm in the training stage, 4 normal plan clusters were formed. The distance between the samples in the testing set and the cluster centers were then determined. To evaluate the effect of dimensionality reduction (DR) on detection accuracy, principal component analysis (PCA) and autoencoder (AE) methods were compared. Results: The sensitivity of the anomaly detection model based on PCA and AE methods were 84.2% (16/19) and 94.7% (18/19), respectively. The specificity of the anomaly detection model based on PCA and AE methods were 64.6% (102/158) and 69.0% (109/158), respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUCs) based on PCA and AE methods were 0.81 and 0.90, respectively. Conclusions: The unsupervised learning method was effective for detecting anomalies from the feature samples. Accuracy could be improved with the introduction of AE-based DR technique. The combination of AE and k-means clustering methods provides an automated way to identify abnormal plans among clinical treatment plans in radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Anomaly detectionautoencoder (AE)clustering analysistreatment plan

Identifiers

PMID37064364
PMCPMC10102771
OpenAlexW4361028705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.