ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Exploration of the correlation between superficial cerebral veins identified using susceptibility-weighted imaging findings and cognitive differences between sexes based on deep learning: a preliminary study.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Evaluation of Neonatal Cerebral Circulation Under Hypoxic Ischemic Risk Factors Based on Quantitative Analysis of Cerebral Veins with Magnetic Resonance Susceptibility Weighted Imaging.Clinical neuroradiology · 2024Article
- The Venular Side of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: Proof of Concept of a Neglected Issue.Biomedicines · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to investigate the association of superficial cerebral veins (SCVs) with sex-related cognitive differences and the possible hemodynamic mechanisms underlying these associations. Methods: This investigation was a prospective case-control study. A total of 344 healthy volunteers were recruited. In all, 200 volunteers were included to establish the deep learning model, and 144 volunteers were used for the research, including 72 males (50%) and 72 females (50%). No significant differences in age (P=0.358) or education (P=0.779) were observed between the sexes. Cognitive functioning was evaluated using neuropsychological tests, including the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic (MOCA-B). Susceptibility-weighted imaging scans were acquired with a 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging system using a 32-channel high-resolution phased array coil. Minimum intensity projection images were obtained by reconstructing susceptibility-weighted imaging data. A deep learning model was trained on the minimum intensity projection images to quantify the diameter, tortuosity index, length, and the number of SCVs in the bilateral cerebral hemispheres. Finally, the association between cognitive differences between males and females and the properties of the SCVs was analyzed. Results: The MMSE and MOCA-B scores of males were significantly higher than those of females (P<0.05). Males had more SCVs in the bilateral cerebral hemispheres than did females (right hemisphere: P<0.01; left hemisphere: P<0.05). The number of SCVs in the right cerebral hemisphere was significantly and positively correlated with the MMSE and MOCA-B scores (correlation coefficients: 0.246 and 0.201, respectively; P<0.05). The number of SCVs in the left cerebral hemisphere was positively correlated with the MMSE scores (correlation coefficient: 0.196; P<0.05) and the MOCA-B scores. In this study, no significant correlations were observed between cognition and the diameter, length, or tortuosity index of the SCVs in the bilateral cerebral hemispheres. Conclusions: The cognitive function of males was better than that of females, and the different numbers of SCVs may be one of the explanations for this phenomenon of sex-based differences in cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.