ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Artificial intelligence diagnosis of intrauterine adhesion by 3D ultrasound imaging: a prospective study.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence, Deep Learning, and Computer Vision in Hysteroscopy: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Ultrasound in Women's Health: Mechanisms, Applications, and Emerging Opportunities.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Machine learning approach for predicting the severity risk of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.Frontiers in big data · 2026Article
- Progress in the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Ultrasound-Assisted Medical Diagnosis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound for intrauterine adhesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Long-term effects of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis on postoperative pregnancy rates and fertility outcomes in patients with intrauterine adhesions.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Evolving the Era of 5D Ultrasound? A Systematic Literature Review on the Applications for Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There were a very large number of intrauterine adhesion (IUA) patients. As improving the classification of three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (3D-TVUS) of IUA or non-IUA images remains a clinical challenge and is needed to avoid inappropriate surgery. Our study aimed to evaluate deep learning as a method to classify 3D-TVUS of IUA or non-IUA images taken with panoramic technology. Methods: After meeting an inclusion/exclusion criteria, a total of 4,401 patients were selected for this study. This included 2,803 IUA patients and 1,598 non-IUA patients. IUA was confirmed by hysteroscopy, and each patient underwent one 3D-TVUS examination. Four well-known convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures were selected to classify the IUA images: Visual Geometry Group16 (VGG16), InceptionV3, ResNet50, and ResNet101. We used these pretrained CNNs on ImageNet by applying both TensorFlow and PyTorch. All 3D-TVUS images were normalized and mixed together. We split the data set into a training set, validation set, and test set. The performance of our classification model was evaluated according to sensitivity, precision, F1-score, and accuracy, which were determined by equations that used true-positive (TP), false-positive (FP), true-negative (TN), and false-negative (FN) numbers. Results: The overall performances of VGG16, InceptionV3, ResNet50, and ResNet101 were better in PyTorch as opposed to TensorFlow. Through PyTorch, the best CNN model was InceptionV3 with its performance measured as 94.2% sensitivity, 99.4% precision, 96.8% F1-score, and 97.3% accuracy. The area under the curve (AUC) results of VGG16, InceptionV3, ResNet50, and ResNet101 were 0.959, 0.999, 0.997, and 0.999, respectively. PyTorch also successfully transferred information from the source to the target domain where we were able to use another center's data as an external test data set. No overfitting that could have adversely affected the classification accuracy occurred. Finally, we successfully established a webpage to diagnose IUA based on the 3D-TVUS images. Conclusions: Deep learning can assist in the binary classification of 3D-TVUS images to diagnose IUA. This study lays the foundation for future research into the integration of deep learning and blockchain technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.