Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37064345›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023

Prolonged imaging time in the salivagram appears unnecessary for detecting aspiration.

Zhe Wen, Hongming Zhuang, Jigang Yang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhe WenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hongming ZhuangDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jigang YangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Beijing Friendship Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNPhiladelphia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The salivagram was first described to detect possible lung aspiration in infants or young children. Its original protocol required dynamic imaging for 60 minutes, which has high sensitivity. The purpose of this retrospective investigation was to determine whether a shortened period of image acquisition can be adopted without significantly reducing the sensitivity of the test in detecting aspiration. Methods: The current salivagram protocol in our hospital requires 60 minutes of dynamic imaging. The images of a total of 398 patients (ages 1 month to 9 years old) with positive salivagrams were analyzed. The entire 60-minute dynamic images were divided into 6 periods, 10 minutes/period. The time of the onset of abnormal activity in the bronchi, which was evidence of aspiration in each patient, was recorded and assigned to the corresponding period. Results: Among all 398 patients with evidence of aspiration, tracheobronchial tree activity could be seen in the first 10 minutes of the dynamic imaging in 184 of them (46.2%, 184/398). The onset of the bronchial activity was seen between 10 and 20 minutes in 177 patients (44.5%, 177/398). A total of 35 patients (8.8%, 35/398) had the onset of abnormal tracheobronchial tree activity in the 3rd period between 20 and 30 minutes. During the 4 Conclusions: The originally described 60-minute dynamic imaging protocol of the salivagram can be safely shortened to 40 or even 30 minutes without a significantly decreased chance of detecting aspiration. Prolonged imaging is unnecessary.

Indexed as

aspirationchildrenSalivagramsingle-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID37064345
PMCPMC10102760
OpenAlexW4320185996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.