Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37064324›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2023

The assessment of suture spacing on the esthetic and functional outcomes of skin closures in different age groups.

Nader Pazyar, Maryam Movahedyan, Reza Yaghoobi, Mohammad Hosein Haghighizadeh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nader PazyarFaculty of Dermatology Department Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences Ahvaz Iran.
Maryam MovahedyanDermatology Department, Emam Hospital, School of Medicine Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences Ahvaz Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3647-3526
Reza YaghoobiFaculty of Dermatology Department Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences Ahvaz Iran.
Mohammad Hosein HaghighizadehDepartment of Biostatistics Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences Ahvaz Iran.
Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Dermatological surgeons must master the factors affecting wound healing. Suturing is the most common method of wound closure. One of the significant factors in suturing that affects wound healing and cosmetic results is the distance between sutures, which has been studied very little to date. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of simple interrupted suture with a distance of 2 and 5 mm on the esthetic and functional results of suture closure in different age groups. Methods: In patients with two skin lesions, one wound was sutured with a distance of 2 mm and the other with a distance of 5 mm, and the wounds were evaluated 1 and 3 months after the operation using the POSAS scale. Results: Patients' opinions indicate that, in the suture intervals of 2- and 5-mm and at 1 and 3 months, the average was lower in the younger group than it was in the older group and also, as per the physician's opinion, the average in the age group under 50 years was significantly lower than that in the age group over 50 years. Conclusions: According to the results of the present study, a suture of 2-mm and a suture of 5-mm would result in different esthetic and functional outcomes depending on the patient's age. The average in the age group less than 50 years was significantly lower than that of the age group greater than 50 years.

Indexed as

dermatologyotolaryngologysurgery

Identifiers

PMID37064324
PMCPMC10098442
OpenAlexW4366083571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.