Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37064263›Full record

ReviewCentral European journal of urology2023

Comprehensive overview of ureteral stents based on clinical aspects, material and design.

Valentina Bernasconi, Marco Tozzi, Amelia Pietropaolo, Vincent De Coninck, Bhaskar K Somani, Thomas Tailly, Ewa Bres-Niewada, Ioannis Mykoniatis, Andrea Gregori, Michele Talso

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Central European journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Valentina BernasconiASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco Ringgold, Department of Urology, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milano, Italy.
Marco TozziIstituto Europeo di Oncologia Ringgold, Department of Urology, Milano, Lombardia, Italy.
Amelia PietropaoloUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Vincent De ConinckEAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, Arnhem, Netherlands.
Bhaskar K SomaniUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Thomas TaillyEAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, Arnhem, Netherlands.
Ewa Bres-NiewadaRoefler Memorial Hospital, Department of Urology, Pruszków, Poland.
Ioannis MykoniatisEAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, Arnhem, Netherlands.
Andrea GregoriASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco Ringgold, Department of Urology, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milano, Italy.
Michele TalsoASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco Ringgold, Department of Urology, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milano, Italy.
European Association of Urology · NLASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco · ITAZ Klina · BELombardia Informatica (Italy) · ITUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ureteral stents are useful devices in urological surgery. The main objective of a ureteric stent is to allow passage of urine and reduce early or late complications related to obstruction in the urinary tract. Despite their widespread use, there is a general lack of knowledge and awareness in stent composition and indication of application. We represented a synthesis of our extensive research over materials, coatings and shapes available on the market and then analyzed the main characteristics and peculiarities of ureteral stents. We have also focused our attention over the side effects and complication that must be considered when placing a ureteral stent. Encrustation, microbial colonization, stent-related symptoms and patient's history must always be evaluated when there is the need for a ureteral stent. The perfect stent should have many characteristics including easy insertion and removal, easy manipulation, resistance to encrustation and migration, lack of complications, biocompatibility, radio-opacity, biodurability, affordability (cost-effectiveness), tolerability and optimal flow characteristics. Nevertheless, further research and studies need to be done to provide more information about stent composition and efficacy in vivo. In this narrative review, we covered the basic information and main characteristics of ureteral stents, in order to help clinicians choose the appropriate device needed for a given situation.

Indexed as

kidney calculiRIRSureteral obstructionureteral stentureteroscopyurolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID37064263
PMCPMC10091895
OpenAlexW4323345820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.