Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37064177›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Perampanel outcomes at different stages of treatment in people with focal and generalized epilepsy treated in clinical practice: Evidence from the PERMIT study.

Claudio Liguori, Estevo Santamarina, Adam Strzelczyk, Juan Jesús Rodríguez-Uranga, Rohit Shankar, Xiana Rodríguez-Osorio, Stéphane Auvin, Paolo Bonanni, Eugen Trinka, Rob McMurray and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Claudio LiguoriEpilepsy Centre, Neurology Unit, University Hospital "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Estevo SantamarinaEpilepsy Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Adam StrzelczykEpilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Department of Neurology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Juan Jesús Rodríguez-UrangaCentro de Neurología Avanzada, Sevilla, Spain.
Rohit ShankarPeninsula School of Medicine, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Xiana Rodríguez-OsorioDepartment of Neurology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago, Spain.
Stéphane AuvinUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM NeuroDiderot, Paris, France.
Paolo BonanniEpilpesy and Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Scientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Conegliano, Treviso, Italy.
Eugen TrinkaDepartment of Neurology, Christian-Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Member of EpiCARE, Salzburg, Austria.
Rob McMurrayEisai Europe Ltd., Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Ricardo Sáinz-FuertesEisai Europe Ltd., Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Vicente VillanuevaRefractory Epilepsy Unit, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Eisai (United Kingdom) · GBComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago · ESGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESInserm · FRIRCCS Eugenio Medea · ITParacelsus Medical University · ATPeninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry · GBUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The PERMIT study is the largest pooled analysis of perampanel (PER) clinical practice data conducted to date. Methods: This Results: The Full Analysis Set included 1184 and 2861 PWE treated with PER as early and late add-on therapy, respectively. Compared to the late add-on subgroup, the early add-on subgroup was characterized by later mean age at epilepsy onset, shorter mean duration of epilepsy, lower rates of intellectual disability and psychiatric comorbidity, and lower frequency of seizures per month, suggesting a less severe form of epilepsy in this subgroup. After 12 months, retention was significantly higher in the early versus late add-on subgroup (67.7% vs. 62.4%; Discussion: This study demonstrated that PER was effective and generally well tolerated when initiated as early or late add-on therapy, but it was significantly more effective and better tolerated when initiated early. These findings support PER's use as a broad-spectrum, early add-on therapy for use in PWE with focal and generalized seizures.

Indexed as

clinical practiceearly add-on therapyeffectivenessfocal epilepsygeneralized epilepsyobservational studyperampaneltolerability

Identifiers

PMID37064177
PMCPMC10098362
OpenAlexW4361279310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.