Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37064040›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2023

[

Søren Hess

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The diagnostic role of 2-[La Radiologia medica · 2025
    Article
  4. [Annals of intensive care · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Diagnostic Yield of [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Søren HessDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark.
Hospital South West Jutland · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteremia is the presence of viable bacteria in the bloodstream, a complicated and potentially dangerous systemic medical condition that may range from asymptomatic and clinically relatively indolent cases to more severe bloodstream infection (BSI) and ultimately life-threatening septic shock with fatal outcome. BSI is classified as simple (bacteremia only) or complex (BSI with metastatic spread), and the morbidity is higher in the latter, probably due to insufficient eradication. Treatment of simple BSI is usually short-term antibiotic courses, whereas complex BSI with metastatic foci requires more advanced treatment including long-term antibiotics or invasive drainage to gain infection control. Thus, identifying metastatic infection has an important clinical impact but remains a challenge; only half of the patients progress to complex BSI, and many patients present without relevant signs or symptoms, so imaging is pivotal. This review summarizes the potential role and recommendations of [

Indexed as

[18F]FDG-PET/CTbacteremiablood stream infection (BSI)infectionPET

Identifiers

PMID37064040
PMCPMC10095558
OpenAlexW4361298367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.