Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37063939›Full record

ArticleThe mental health clinician2023

Psychotropic stewardship: Advancing patient care.

Robert J Haight, Chelsea N Di Polito, Gregory H Payne, Jolene R Bostwick, April Fulbright, Jonathan F Lister, Andrew M Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The mental health clinician, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robert J HaightClinical Pharmacist - Southern Cities Clinic & Forensic Services, Saint Peter Regional Treatment Center (SPRTC), Minnesota Department of Human Services, Saint Peter, Minnesota, Robert.J.Haight@state.mn.us.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0099-3159
Chelsea N Di PolitoAssistant Director, Pharmacy Administration - Clinical Services, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4152-6247
Gregory H PayneDirector of Strategic Initiatives, American Association of Psychiatric Pharmacists, Lincoln, Nebraska.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8592-7280
Jolene R BostwickAssistant Dean for Co-Curriculum and Professional Development & Clinical Professor, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4587-7773
April FulbrightClinical Pharmacist, Caromont Regional Medical Center, Gastonia, North Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7403-8963
Jonathan F ListerClinical Pharmacy Practitioner, VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6493-7420
Andrew M WilliamsSupervising Clinical Pharmacist Behavioral Health Pharmacies, Riverside University Health System, Riverside, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3140-414X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Board Certified Psychiatric Pharmacists (BCPPs) practice in a variety of inpatient and outpatient health care settings as part of collaborative, multidisciplinary teams. The American Association of Psychiatric Pharmacists (AAPP) has promoted the expansion of psychiatric pharmacy through the development of psychotropic stewardship programs (PSPs). Based on the standards developed during the creation and expansion of antimicrobial stewardship programs, psychotropic stewardship promotes the safe and appropriate use of psychotropic medications. AAPP envisions every patient with a psychiatric diagnosis will have their medication treatment plan reviewed, optimized, and managed by a psychotropic stewardship team with a psychiatric pharmacist as a co-leader. Because of variations in practice site resources, patient populations, and provider collaboration, the creation and implementation of PSPs should be based on site-specific needs and opportunities. Initial patient identification could prioritize those prescribed multiple medications, high-risk psychotropics, or comorbid medical diagnoses. However, every patient prescribed a psychotropic medication should have the opportunity to work with a PSP. Incremental implementation may be required during the planning stages of stewardship teams. Use of clinical practice-related core outcomes will allow for the optimization of program resources, increased recognition, and improved patient outcomes. PSPs should be patient-focused and integrate patients' preferences and access to recommended treatment options. The eventual goal of PSP implementation is official recognition by key regulatory agencies as a standard of care for patients who receive a diagnosis of a psychiatric or substance use disorder.

Indexed as

clinical pharmacistscomprehensive medication managementpsychiatric disorderspsychiatric pharmacistspsychotropic drugspsychotropic stewardship

Identifiers

PMID37063939
PMCPMC10094994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.