ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023
Directional preference for glioblastoma cancer cell membrane encapsulated nanoparticle population: A probabilistic approach for cancer therapeutics.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Editorial: New mechanisms for anti-cancer drugs.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Microglia Polarization and Antiglioma Effects Fostered by Dual Cell Membrane-Coated Doxorubicin-Loaded Hexagonal Boron Nitride Nanoflakes.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Selective cancer cell recognition is the most challenging objective in the targeted delivery of anti-cancer agents. Extruded specific cancer cell membrane coated nanoparticles, exploiting the potential of homotypic binding along with certain protein-receptor interactions, have recently proven to be the method of choice for targeted delivery of anti-cancer drugs. Prediction of the selective targeting efficiency of the cancer cell membrane encapsulated nanoparticles (CCMEN) is the most critical aspect in selecting this strategy as a method of delivery. Materials and methods: A probabilistic model based on binding scores and differential expression levels of Glioblastoma cancer cells (GCC) membrane proteins (factors and receptors) was implemented on python 3.9.1. Conditional binding efficiency (CBE) was derived for each combination of protein involved in the interactions. Selective propensities and Odds ratios in favour of cancer cells interactions were determined for all the possible combination of surface proteins for 'k' degree of interaction. The model was experimentally validated by two types of Test cultures. Results: Several Glioblastoma cell surface antigens were identified from literature and databases. Those were screened based on the relevance, availability of expression levels and crystal structure in public databases. High priority eleven surface antigens were selected for probabilistic modelling. A new term, Break-even point (BEP) was defined as a characteristic of the typical cancer cell membrane encapsulated delivery agents. The model predictions lie within ±7% of the experimentally observed values for both experimental test culture types. Conclusion: The implemented probabilistic model efficiently predicted the directional preference of the exposed nanoparticle coated with cancer cell membrane (in this case GCC membrane). This model, however, is developed and validated for glioblastoma, can be easily tailored for any type of cancer involving CCMEN as delivery agents for potential cancer immunotherapy. This probabilistic model would help in the development of future cancer immunotherapeutic with greater specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.