ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2023
Geometric impact and dose estimation of on-patient placement of a lightweight receiver coil in a clinical magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy workflow for prostate cancer.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a deep learning magnetic resonance imaging reconstruction method for synthetic computed tomography generation in prostate radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: For pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only radiotherapy the use of receiver coil bridges (CB) is recommended to avoid deformation of the patient. Development in coil technology has enabled lightweight, flexible coils. In this work we evaluate the effects of a lightweight coil in a pelvic MRI-only radiotherapy workflow. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one patients, referred to prostate MRI-only radiotherapy, were included. Images were acquired with and without CB. Anatomical deformation from the on-patient coil placement was measured in the anterior-posterior (AP) and left-right (LR) direction. The change in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was measured in phantom and in vivo.The clinical treatment plan, created on the image with CB, was transferred and recalculated on the image without the CB. Dose metrics for the targets (planning- and clinical target volume) and organs at risks (OAR) were analyzed. Results: There was a statistically significant increase in SNR in-vivo (median 21 %, p = 0.002) when removing the CB. Anatomical differences after removing the CB in patients were -1.5 mm in AP (median change) and + 2.5 mm in LR direction. Dosimetric differences for the target structures were clinically negligible, but statistically significant. The difference in target mean doses were 0.2 % (both p = 0.004) of the prescribed dose. No dosimetric differences were observed for the OAR, except for the penile bulb. Conclusions: We concluded that anatomical change and dosimetric differences, originating from scanning without CB were minor. The CB can thereby be removed from the workflow, enabling easier patient positioning and increased SNR when using lightweight coils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.