Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37063493›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2023

Patient-specific uncertainty and bias quantification of non-transparent convolutional neural network model through knowledge distillation and Bayesian deep learning.

Hao Gong, Lifeng Yu, Shuai Leng, Scott S Hsieh, Joel G Fletcher, Cynthia H McCollough

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hao GongDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.
Lifeng YuDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.
Shuai LengDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.
Scott S HsiehDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.
Joel G FletcherDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.
Cynthia H McColloughDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.

Funding

Trade-offs in human observer performance, image quality metrics, and patient doseR01EB017095 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Hao Gong, Cynthia H McCollough · 2012 to 2026
$7.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing the reliability of convolutional neural network (CNN)-based CT imaging techniques is critical for reliable deployment in practice. Some evaluation methods exist but require full access to target CNN architecture and training data, something not available for proprietary or commercial algorithms. Moreover, there is a lack of systematic evaluation methods. To address these issues, we propose a patient-specific uncertainty and bias quantification (UNIQ) method that integrates knowledge distillation and Bayesian deep learning. Knowledge distillation creates a transparent CNN ("Student CNN") to approximate the target non-transparent CNN ("Teacher CNN"). Student CNN is built as a Bayesian-deep-learning-based probabilistic CNN that, for each input, always generates statistical distribution of the corresponding outputs, and characterizes predictive mean and two major uncertainties - data and model uncertainty. UNIQ was evaluated using a low-dose CT denoising task. Patient and phantom scans with routine-dose and synthetic quarter-dose were used to create training, validation, and testing sets. To demonstrate, Unet and Resnet were used as backbones of Teacher CNN and Student CNN respectively and were trained using independent training sets. Student Resnet was qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated. The pixel-wise predictive mean, data uncertainty, and model uncertainty from Student Resnet were very similar to the counterparts from Teacher Unet (mean-absolute-error: predictive mean 1.5HU, data uncertainty 1.8HU, model uncertainty 1.3HU; mean 2D correlation coefficient: total uncertainty 0.90, data uncertainty 0.86, model uncertainty 0.83). The proposed UNIQ can potentially systematically characterize the reliability of non-transparent CNN models used in CT.

Indexed as

Bayesian neural networkbiasDeep learningknowledge distillationuncertaintyx-ray CT

Identifiers

PMID37063493
PMCPMC10100102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.