ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2023
Patient-specific uncertainty and bias quantification of non-transparent convolutional neural network model through knowledge distillation and Bayesian deep learning.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving low-contrast liver metastasis detectability in deep-learning CT denoising using adaptive local fusion driven by total uncertainty and predictive mean.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assessing the reliability of convolutional neural network (CNN)-based CT imaging techniques is critical for reliable deployment in practice. Some evaluation methods exist but require full access to target CNN architecture and training data, something not available for proprietary or commercial algorithms. Moreover, there is a lack of systematic evaluation methods. To address these issues, we propose a patient-specific uncertainty and bias quantification (UNIQ) method that integrates knowledge distillation and Bayesian deep learning. Knowledge distillation creates a transparent CNN ("Student CNN") to approximate the target non-transparent CNN ("Teacher CNN"). Student CNN is built as a Bayesian-deep-learning-based probabilistic CNN that, for each input, always generates statistical distribution of the corresponding outputs, and characterizes predictive mean and two major uncertainties - data and model uncertainty. UNIQ was evaluated using a low-dose CT denoising task. Patient and phantom scans with routine-dose and synthetic quarter-dose were used to create training, validation, and testing sets. To demonstrate, Unet and Resnet were used as backbones of Teacher CNN and Student CNN respectively and were trained using independent training sets. Student Resnet was qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated. The pixel-wise predictive mean, data uncertainty, and model uncertainty from Student Resnet were very similar to the counterparts from Teacher Unet (mean-absolute-error: predictive mean 1.5HU, data uncertainty 1.8HU, model uncertainty 1.3HU; mean 2D correlation coefficient: total uncertainty 0.90, data uncertainty 0.86, model uncertainty 0.83). The proposed UNIQ can potentially systematically characterize the reliability of non-transparent CNN models used in CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.