ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2023
Multi-energy CT material decomposition using Bayesian deep convolutional neural network with explicit penalty of uncertainty and bias.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-assisted six-dimensional CT imaging for joint instability assessment.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026Article
- Improving low-contrast liver metastasis detectability in deep-learning CT denoising using adaptive local fusion driven by total uncertainty and predictive mean.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Convolutional neural network (CNN)-based material decomposition has the potential to improve image quality (visual appearance) and quantitative accuracy of material maps. Most methods use deterministic CNNs with mean-square-error loss to provide point-estimates of mass densities. Point estimates can be over-confident as the reliability of CNNs is frequently compromised by bias and two major uncertainties - data and model uncertainties originating from noise in inputs and train-test data dissimilarity, respectively. Also, mean-square-error lacks explicit control of uncertainty and bias. To tackle these problems, a Bayesian dual-task CNN (BDT-CNN) with explicit penalization of uncertainty and bias was developed. It is a probabilistic CNN that concurrently conducts material classification and quantification and allows for pixel-wise modeling of bias, data uncertainty, and model uncertainty. CNN was trained with images of physical and simulated tissue-mimicking inserts at varying mass densities. Hydroxyapatite (nominal density 400mg/cc) and blood (nominal density 1095mg/cc) inserts were placed in different-sized body phantoms (30 - 45cm) and used to evaluate mean-absolute-bias (MAB) in predicted mass densities across different images at routine- and half-routine-dose. Patient CT exams were collected to assess generalizability of BDT-CNN in the presence of anatomical background. Noise insertion was used to simulate patient exams at half- and quarter-routine-dose. The deterministic dual-task CNN was used as baseline. In phantoms, BDT-CNN improved consistency of insert delineation, especially edges, and reduced overall bias (average MAB for hydroxyapatite: BDT-CNN 5.4mgHA/cc, baseline 11.0mgHA/cc and blood: BDT-CNN 8.9mgBlood/cc, baseline 14.0mgBlood/cc). In patient images, BDT-CNN improved detail preservation, lesion conspicuity, and structural consistency across different dose levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.