ArticleJAMIA open2023
Assessing an electronic self-report method for improving quality of ethnicity and race data in the Veterans Health Administration.
Article in JAMIA open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and Correlates of Social Risks and Receipt of Resources Among Rural and Urban Veterans.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026Article
- Racial, Ethnic, and Sex Differences in Social Risks and Social Needs Concordance Among Veterans.JAMA network open · 2026Observational
- Variation of eGFR Wait Time Modifications for Black Kidney Transplant Candidates in the United States.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025Article
- Recommendations to improve race identification in health records: A rapid scoping review.PloS one · 2025Article
- Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics Associated With Veterans' Digital Needs.JAMA network open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate self-reported electronic screening ( Materials and Methods: We compared missing, declined, and complete (neither missing nor declined) rates between (1) Results: Conculsions: eScreening is a promising method for improving ethnicity and race data accuracy and completeness in VA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.