ArticleFrontiers in health services2023
Co-designing, measuring, and optimizing innovations and solutions within complex adaptive health systems.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Participatory design partnerships for gender and health in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.Global health action · 2026Article
- Proposed Innovation Ecosystem for Prolapse Surgery: Delphi Consensus on Roles and Responsibilities Across Innovation Lifecycle.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- An evidence gap map of digital health interventions for enhancing patient engagement in healthcare.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical Organizational Science: an integrative framework for structural intervention in complex organizations.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: a critical approach to patient-centred equity design.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
- Simple but complex: aged care healthcare professionals' perspectives on the design of a digital falls dashboard.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Measuring the Science of Caring: A Patient-Centred Predictive Model for the Caring Interaction.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2025Article
- The Caring Life Course Theory: Opening new frontiers in care-A cardiac rehabilitation example.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- The ILC Maine statement: Time for the fundamental care [r]evolution.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Coupling coordination and regional health equity: an empirical study of economic, social, and healthcare systems in Zhejiang Province, China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The SCOPE framework - implementing ideals of responsible research assessment.F1000Research · 2023Article
- Health System Enablers and Barriers to Continuity of Care for First Nations Peoples Living with Chronic Disease.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To introduce, describe, and demonstrate the emergence and testing of an evaluation method that combines different logics for co-designing, measuring, and optimizing innovations and solutions within complex adaptive health systems. Method: We describe the development and preliminary testing of a framework to evaluate new ways of using and implementing knowledge (innovations) and technological solutions to solve problems Results: Snapshots of ongoing research in different healthcare settings within Australia are offered to demonstrate how PROLIFERATE can be used for co-designing innovations, tracking their optimization process, and evaluating their impacts. The exemplification involves the evaluation of Health2Go (the design and implementation of an innovative procedure: interdisciplinary learning within an allied health service-community-based) and RAPIDx_AI (an artificial intelligence randomized clinical trial being tested to improve the cardiac care of patients within emergency departments-tertiary care). Conclusion: PROLIFERATE is one of the first frameworks to combine ecological, mechanistic, and social logic models to co-design, track, and evaluate complex interventions while operationalizing an innovative complexity science approach: the knowledge translation complexity network model (KT-cnm). It adds a novel perspective to the importance of stakeholders' agency in the system by considering their sociodemographic characteristics and experiences within different healthcare settings (e.g., procedural innovations such as "interdisciplinary learning" for Health2Go, and tech-enabled solutions such as RAPIDx_AI). Its structured facilitation processes engage stakeholders in dynamic and productive ways while measuring and optimizing innovation within the complexities of health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.