Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37063179›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Characterizing conflict and congruence of molecular evolution across organellar genome sequences for phylogenetics in land plants.

Alexa S Tyszka, Eric C Bretz, Holly M Robertson, Miles D Woodcock-Girard, Karolis Ramanauskas, Drew A Larson, Gregory W Stull, Joseph F Walker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparative mitochondrial genomics of cultivatedFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Analysis of the mitochondrial genome of theFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexa S TyszkaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Eric C BretzDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Holly M RobertsonSainsbury Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom.
Miles D Woodcock-GirardDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Karolis RamanauskasDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Drew A LarsonDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Gregory W StullGermplasm Bank of Wild Species in Southwest China, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Joseph F WalkerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
University of Illinois Chicago · USIndiana University Bloomington · USNational Museum of Natural History · USUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chloroplasts and mitochondria each contain their own genomes, which have historically been and continue to be important sources of information for inferring the phylogenetic relationships among land plants. The organelles are predominantly inherited from the same parent, and therefore should exhibit phylogenetic concordance. In this study, we examine the mitochondrion and chloroplast genomes of 226 land plants to infer the degree of similarity between the organelles' evolutionary histories. Our results show largely concordant topologies are inferred between the organelles, aside from four well-supported conflicting relationships that warrant further investigation. Despite broad patterns of topological concordance, our findings suggest that the chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes evolved with significant differences in molecular evolution. The differences result in the genes from the chloroplast and the mitochondrion preferentially clustering with other genes from their respective organelles by a program that automates selection of evolutionary model partitions for sequence alignments. Further investigation showed that changes in compositional heterogeneity are not always uniform across divergences in the land plant tree of life. These results indicate that although the chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes have coexisted for over 1 billion years, phylogenetically, they are still evolving sufficiently independently to warrant separate models of evolution. As genome sequencing becomes more accessible, research into these organelles' evolution will continue revealing insight into the ancient cellular events that shaped not only their history, but the history of plants as a whole.

Indexed as

chloroplast genomecombinabilitymitochondrial genomephylogenetic conflictphylogeneticsphylogenomicsplastome

Identifiers

PMID37063179
PMCPMC10098128
OpenAlexW4361276328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.